City comparison
Chicago vs Rome
Chicago scores higher on salary; Rome has a lower cost of living. Compare Chicago and Rome on earnings, rent pressure, career opportunity, and 3-year financial impact.
Overall verdict
Chicago scores higher overall
Rome is a step down on both savings and career opportunity
How they compare
If you want to save more
ChicagoOverall fitRome
62 / 40+22 Chicago
ChicagoSavingsRome
58 / 36+22 Chicago
ChicagoCareerRome
73 / 45+28 Chicago
ChicagoLow pressureRome
63 / 47+16 Chicago
If you want career growth
ChicagoOverall fitRome
68 / 44+24 Chicago
ChicagoSavingsRome
58 / 36+22 Chicago
ChicagoCareerRome
73 / 45+28 Chicago
ChicagoLow pressureRome
63 / 47+16 Chicago
If you want better balance
ChicagoOverall fitRome
66 / 56+10 Chicago
ChicagoSavingsRome
58 / 36+22 Chicago
ChicagoCareerRome
73 / 45+28 Chicago
ChicagoLow pressureRome
63 / 47+16 Chicago
Financial impact: moving from Chicago to Rome
Based on a representative $80,000 USD salary. Not tax-adjusted.
-$2,516
Monthly
-$30,192
1 year
-$90,576
3 years
Moving from Chicago to Rome: trade-offs
You gain
+Better quality of life — Rome scores higher on lifestyle and liveability
You lose
−Weaker savings potential — Rome is 22 points lower on savings capacity
−-$2,516/mo estimated net reduction — $30,192 over the first year
−Smaller career market — fewer top-tier roles and lower salary ceiling than your current city
−Higher cost pressure — rent will consume a larger share of your income
Get a personalised verdict for your salary
The comparison above uses a representative salary. Enter yours for an accurate picture.
Compare with my salary →Related comparisons
Also see: Rome vs Chicago →