City comparison
San Francisco vs London
SF pays more but costs dramatically more. London offers a broader market at lower pressure for many roles.
Overall verdict
San Francisco scores higher overall
London is a step down on both savings and career opportunity
How they compare
If you want to save more
San FranciscoOverall fitLondon
65 / 48+17 San
San FranciscoSavingsLondon
56 / 43+13 San
San FranciscoCareerLondon
96 / 81+15 San
San FranciscoLow pressureLondon
60 / 31+29 San
If you want career growth
San FranciscoOverall fitLondon
81 / 63+18 San
San FranciscoSavingsLondon
56 / 43+13 San
San FranciscoCareerLondon
96 / 81+15 San
San FranciscoLow pressureLondon
60 / 31+29 San
If you want better balance
San FranciscoOverall fitLondon
71 / 58+13 San
San FranciscoSavingsLondon
56 / 43+13 San
San FranciscoCareerLondon
96 / 81+15 San
San FranciscoLow pressureLondon
60 / 31+29 San
Financial impact: moving from San Francisco to London
Based on a representative $80,000 USD salary. Not tax-adjusted.
-$1,652
Monthly
-$19,824
1 year
-$59,472
3 years
Moving from San Francisco to London: trade-offs
You lose
−Weaker savings potential — London is 13 points lower on savings capacity
−-$1,652/mo estimated net reduction — $19,824 over the first year
−Smaller career market — fewer top-tier roles and lower salary ceiling than your current city
−Higher cost pressure — rent will consume a larger share of your income
San Francisco
USSalary index
100
Cost index
90
Rent pressure
40
Opportunity
94
Get a personalised verdict for your salary
The comparison above uses a representative salary. Enter yours for an accurate picture.
Compare with my salary →Related comparisons
Also see: London vs San Francisco →